Subscribe to The Y’all — a weekly dispatch about the people, places and policies defining Texas, produced by Texas Tribune journalists living in communities across the state.
LUBBOCK — Recently, Lubbock’s city leaders have sparked significant debate among residents over the approval of changes to two parcels of land that could dramatically alter the community’s landscape.
On Tuesday, the Lubbock City Council made the bold decision to annex an 8-acre tract of land and rezone an additional 52 acres from single-family residential to industrial use. These changes have raised eyebrows and fueled concerns among the community.
The smaller tract, located in North Lubbock near a rail line, and the larger parcel adjacent to Interstate 27 were both requested by the Lubbock Economic Development Alliance (LEDA). While city leaders have not confirmed specific plans for the properties, speculation is rampant that they may serve as a conduit for a new industrial site, particularly a data center.
In the lead-up to the council meeting, a group of concerned residents initiated a petition aimed at imposing an 18-month moratorium on data center developments. However, just before the petition could be verified, the council moved forward with their agenda to change the land designations.
The council meeting became a flashpoint for local residents, who expressed their frustrations vehemently, with some even threatening to initiate a recall of city leaders. Community activist Phyllis Gant encapsulated their sentiments, urging the council to prioritize the voices of those who elected them.
This conflict is not isolated; residents across Texas have raised similar concerns regarding data center projects. Many have successfully halted developments in other regions, suggesting a growing statewide resistance to such industrial expansions.
Residents have consistently voiced their concerns at various city meetings, including a recent packed session at the Lubbock Memorial Civic Center, where they organized protests against data centers, drawing the attention of Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller.
Despite their efforts, many residents feel their concerns have been overlooked, prompting the creation of the petition. If the council votes against the moratorium, the petition organizers plan to take their case to voters in November. This could give Lubbock residents a chance to weigh in on any proposed data center developments.
Mayor Mark McBrayer has indicated that the council is unlikely to support the moratorium, asserting that much of what the petition aims to address is already being considered.
Terry Holeman from Hugo Reed and Associates clarified that one of the properties was never intended to be zoned residential; this designation was a historical artifact from its annexation into the city.
During the council meeting, Councilwoman Christy Martinez-Garcia directly questioned whether the properties were intended for data center use. LEDA’s president, John Osborne, responded, emphasizing that while technically feasible, the properties were not suited for data centers due to logistical challenges.
The meeting was marked by heightened emotions, with residents expressing their frustrations over perceived neglect. Stephen Sanders, one of the petition organizers, appealed to council members to acknowledge the human impact of their decisions.
Despite assurances from council members that no data centers would be placed on the newly annexed land, tension remained palpable as residents demanded accountability from their elected officials.
Osborne reiterated that LEDA’s intention is to attract manufacturing operations that utilize rail service, dismissing the notion that a data center would be the best fit for the newly zoned properties.
As the council meeting concluded, local news revealed a partnership between LEDA and CORVA, a data center company, to establish a smaller data center in East Lubbock. Osborne confirmed that this project is separate from the contentious land changes discussed in the meeting.
He acknowledged the community’s concerns while also emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to economic growth, which includes bringing in projects that can enhance the local tax base without straining resources.
