Subscribe to The Y’all — a weekly dispatch about the people, places and policies defining Texas, produced by Texas Tribune journalists living in communities across the state.
In Odessa, Texas, a growing number of lawmakers are urging the state’s electric grid managers and utility regulators to halt a controversial project aimed at building transmission lines. These lines would traverse thousands of acres of private property, primarily to supply electricity to oil companies operating in the West Texas oil fields.
State Senator Charles Schwertner, a Republican from Georgetown, has publicly called for the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) to reject the applications for this infrastructure project. He indicated that the Texas Legislature plans to revisit the application process next year during its 90th legislative session, seeking to address concerns raised about the current system, which was established in 2023.
Schwertner, who chairs the Senate Committee on Business and Commerce, stated, “These concerns demonstrate the need for a complete overhaul of the … process before these applications can advance.” His sentiments were echoed by Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, who emphasized that while the transmission lines are essential, they should not infringe upon private property rights.
Patrick wrote on social media, highlighting that the existing PUC process for proposing and approving transmission lines is flawed and needs reform. He stressed that any construction of these lines must prioritize not only grid reliability but also the protection of Texas landowners and communities.
These developments follow a tense legislative hearing where the Permian Basin Reliability Plan was discussed. This plan, designed by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), proposes building three 765kV transmission lines to meet the growing electricity demands of the oil and gas industry. Over 100 individuals, including country singer Tanya Tucker, testified for 15 hours, expressing frustration over inadequate notification from utilities and procedural transparency.
Residents voiced significant concerns about the impact of the proposed lines, which would be the largest in Texas. They highlighted potential destruction along the routes, especially in Central Texas, where the landscape is dotted with rivers and rolling hills. The estimated cost of the project is approximately $33 billion, a burden that would ultimately fall on ratepayers.
Landowner Jada Jo Smith, president of the Hill Country Preservation Coalition, articulated the collective sentiment of many affected residents: “These lines are misguided, the routing options are poor, and they threaten Texas and our way of life.” Smith hopes the PUC will heed the concerns raised by legislators and landowners alike by rejecting the current applications.
Mark Bell, president of the Association of Electric Companies of Texas, acknowledged the need for further examination of the proposed routes. He stated, “The existing transmission routing process has been inadequate for the geographic expanse of these projects, and we will continue to work with affected landowners, communities, legislative leaders, and all stakeholders as we meet our shared goal of a stronger, more reliable Texas grid.”
Initially, the plan for these transmission lines received little opposition when it was approved by lawmakers during the 2023 legislative session. The bill, which directed ERCOT to create a blueprint for new transmission lines, passed with overwhelming support in both the Texas House and Senate.
The oil and gas sector has advocated for this project, citing a critical shortage of electricity transmission in the Permian Basin that hampers production growth. Todd Staples, president of the Texas Oil and Gas Association, stressed that West Texans have long funded transmission developments in other regions without receiving equal investment in their own area.
As discussions continue, lawmakers have expressed uncertainty about the scale of the project initially authorized. Senator Kevin Sparks of Midland emphasized the importance of thoroughly exploring all options before infringing on landowner rights, while Senator Lois Kolkhorst called for a pause on the proposal to ensure proper consideration.
— Paul Cobler contributed.
The Texas Oil & Gas Association has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations, and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in The Texas Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
