WASHINGTON – The House is poised to vote on significant legislation aimed at compelling President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from the ongoing conflict with Iran. This legislative action signifies a crucial moment for lawmakers who are grappling with the authority to engage in military actions that the president initiated over two months ago without explicit congressional approval.
This vote is part of ongoing efforts by Democrats to rein in Trump’s military actions through the War Powers Resolution of 1973. Historically, previous votes on similar resolutions have fallen short; however, there is renewed hope among Democrats that this Thursday could mark a turning point in their efforts.
Several Republicans have joined Democrats in a rare bipartisan effort to check the president’s military powers. On Tuesday, the Senate moved forward with another war powers resolution concerning the Iran conflict, buoyed by the support of four GOP senators, while three others were absent from the vote.
A final vote on the Senate’s resolution may also take place on Thursday, although Republican leaders anticipate they will be able to block it once all GOP senators are present.
Frustration Grows Over the Conflict
On Capitol Hill, frustration with the ongoing war has escalated as continual tensions in the Strait of Hormuz disrupt global shipping routes and drive up gas prices domestically. Last week, another House war powers resolution nearly passed, resulting in a tie vote that saw three Republicans supporting the measure.
Representative Gregory Meeks, a Democrat from New York and sponsor of the war powers resolution, expressed optimism about securing enough votes this time. “Congress has a constitutional duty. It has a duty to act, not to cheerlead, especially not to cheerlead an open-ended war of choice,” he stated.
Interestingly, Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, the sole Democrat who opposed last week’s war powers resolution, has indicated he will support the legislation this time. Meanwhile, leaders from both parties are navigating various absences that could sway the vote in either direction within the closely divided chamber.
Legal and Political Implications
While many Republicans have historically supported Trump’s stance on countering Iran’s nuclear ambitions, a growing number are now voicing concerns that the president’s legal window for engaging in military conflict without congressional approval has expired. According to the War Powers Resolution of 1973, a president has 60 days to engage in military action before Congress must either declare war or authorize military force.
“We have to follow the law,” remarked Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican, after voting for an Iran war powers resolution for the first time last week.
Administration’s Stance
The White House contends that the War Powers Resolution’s stipulations are no longer applicable due to a ceasefire with Iran. However, Trump recently stated he was close to ordering further strikes on Iran, only to pause as Gulf allies indicated they were pursuing negotiations to resolve the conflict.
Despite this, Trump took to social media to assert that military leaders should be prepared for “a full, large scale assault on Iran, on a moment’s notice, should an acceptable deal not be reached.” His pattern of setting deadlines for Iran, only to subsequently retract them, has raised eyebrows.
Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican who has typically voted against war powers resolutions, expressed his displeasure with the Trump administration’s approach, particularly criticizing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s handling of the situation. “The current status quo demonstrates how incompetent he is,” Tillis noted, adding that he would be open to supporting a new authorization for military force.
Call for Action
On Wednesday, Democratic senators rallied outside the Capitol alongside VoteVets, a progressive veterans’ advocacy group, displaying signs highlighting the rising average gasoline prices, which have reached $4.53 nationwide.
Senator Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat and Iraq War veteran, criticized the Iran war as a strategic miscalculation by Trump, noting that the conflict has led to a more precarious situation than before, with Iran’s leadership now emboldened to disrupt commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.
In contrast, Republican leaders have praised Trump for what they characterize as decisive action against a long-standing U.S. adversary. “I’m an American. I don’t believe in getting hit and walking away and pretending as though it didn’t happen,” asserted Rep. Brian Mast, the Republican chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
As Congress prepares for this pivotal vote, the growing momentum behind the war powers resolution could precipitate a significant legal confrontation regarding the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches in matters of military conflict.
The House legislation being voted on Thursday is a concurrent resolution, which proponents argue would take effect without the need for Trump’s signature if it successfully passes both chambers of Congress. Nonetheless, Trump has previously declared that the 1973 law, enacted in response to the Vietnam War, is unconstitutional.
___
This article was informed by insights from Associated Press writer Joey Cappelletti.
