In a significant shift in Texas politics, newly elected Attorney General Nathan Johnson has announced his intention to halt the controversial practice of suing out-of-state doctors who prescribe abortion medication to patients in Texas. This decision follows a historic sweep of Texas’ statewide elected offices by Democrats, marking a potential turning point in the ongoing battle over abortion access in the state.
Johnson’s stance represents a direct challenge to the stringent abortion laws enacted in Texas, which have made the procedure nearly inaccessible. Under the previous administration of Ken Paxton, the attorney general’s office aggressively enforced the state’s abortion ban, utilizing lawsuits as a means of intimidation against medical professionals. By refraining from such legal actions, Johnson aims to dismantle what he describes as a tool for “persecution and intimidation.”
“What I can do is cease using Texas abortion laws as an instrument of persecution and intimidation, harassment and political showboating,” Johnson stated in an interview with The Texas Tribune. His comments underscore a shift in the legal landscape regarding abortion rights in Texas, where the current laws have faced increasing scrutiny and opposition from reproductive health advocates.
Currently, Texas law prohibits doctors from mailing abortion medication within the state, leading Paxton to pursue lawsuits against physicians in states where such prescriptions are legal. However, these lawsuits have largely been unsuccessful, thanks to the implementation of shield laws in more liberal states that protect their healthcare providers from legal repercussions. Johnson has made it clear that he will no longer pursue these legal actions, stating, “I will not pursue the judicially absurd position that Texas law has extra territorial effect. I can honor other states’ shield laws.”
While this decision provides a glimmer of hope for those seeking access to abortion medication, it does not equate to a repeal of the restrictive abortion ban in Texas. Governor-elect Gina Hinojosa has also indicated that repealing the ban is not a priority, as such a move would require bipartisan support in a legislature dominated by Republicans.
Political experts, like University of Houston’s Brandon Rottinghaus, suggest that Hinojosa could have significant influence over the application of the law. She has expressed intentions to work towards eliminating penalties for doctors who perform life-saving abortions, a move that could alleviate some of the harsh consequences of the existing ban.
However, anti-abortion advocates remain vigilant. John Seago, president of Texas Right to Life, has voiced concerns over the potential rollback of decades of progress made by Republican leadership in restricting abortion access. He fears that Hinojosa’s administration may undermine programs designed to dissuade women from seeking abortions, such as the Thriving Texas Families program, which allocates substantial funding to support alternatives to abortion.
As the state approaches the upcoming legislative session, the future of abortion access hangs in the balance. Hinojosa’s ability to influence legislative priorities, coupled with the ongoing Sunset review process, could provide her with opportunities to reshape how existing laws are enforced and interpreted.
Despite the obstacles, reproductive rights advocates are determined to push for greater access. Raven E. Freeborn, executive director of Avow Texas, emphasizes the need for a bold vision of abortion access free from exceptions. “We’re going for the most unapologetic vision of abortion access, which is abortion access without exceptions,” she asserts, highlighting the long-term commitment required to challenge the status quo.
As this pivotal moment unfolds in Texas, the implications of these political maneuvers will be felt by many, as both sides prepare for a continued fight over reproductive rights in the Lone Star State.
Disclosure: The University of Houston has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune within the past five years. The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization funded in part by donations from members, foundations, and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in our journalism. Find a complete list of them and more information about our financial and disclosure policies here.
