WASHINGTON – The recent Illinois primaries revealed a significant challenge for the artificial intelligence (AI) and cryptocurrency sectors in their quest to influence American politics. Despite investing heavily in campaign efforts, these industries faced notable setbacks as their preferred candidates failed to secure victories.
In an effort to promote candidates sympathetic to less stringent regulations, tech firms poured millions into the Democratic primaries. Their spending aimed to reshape the regulatory landscape surrounding technologies that are increasingly transformative in both employment and financial management.
Utilizing super PACs, which can spend unlimited amounts on political campaigns, these companies launched extensive advertising campaigns. However, rather than overtly advocating for their industries, much of the messaging focused on broader political themes, such as opposing the Trump administration and supporting progressive policies, mirroring tactics employed by groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
Despite their strategic approach, the involvement of AI and cryptocurrency interests became a flashpoint in the highly competitive Illinois primaries. Notably, the crypto-backed PAC Fairshake invested over $10 million against Illinois Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton, who ultimately won the Democratic nomination to succeed Sen. Dick Durbin.
Fairshake and another crypto-linked PAC, Protect Progress, spent millions in support of Stratton’s primary opponents, U.S. Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi and Robin Kelly, but these efforts did not yield the desired results, as both candidates were defeated.
In the U.S. House primaries, the outcomes of tech-backed spending were mixed. For instance, State Rep. La Shawn Ford, who had supported legislation to regulate AI and cryptocurrency, emerged victorious in the primary to succeed U.S. Rep. Danny Davis, despite nearly $2.5 million in opposition spending from Fairshake.
Similarly, Cook County Commissioner Donna Miller won the Democratic primary to follow Kelly, despite Fairshake’s over $800,000 in spending against state Sen. Robert Peters, another progressive who favored regulating the crypto sector.
The races revealed internal conflicts within the tech sector, particularly surrounding AI. The Think Big PAC, which supports candidates favoring less regulation, invested more than $1 million to promote Jesse Jackson Jr., a former congressman with a controversial past. In contrast, another AI-backed group, Jobs and Democracy PAC, countered with nearly the same amount in negative campaigning against Jackson.
Interestingly, amidst the chaos, former congresswoman Melissa Bean emerged victorious for her old seat, aided by about $1 million from AI-supporting PACs. This suggests a potential path forward for tech interests, as Bean advocates for a national regulatory framework that balances innovation with safety.
Josh Vlasto, a political strategist for Leading the Future—an umbrella organization for AI political groups—expressed optimism about Bean’s vision for AI regulation that also considers economic growth and global competitiveness.
The combined late-stage funding in Illinois approached $20 million, underscoring the ambitions of both the AI and cryptocurrency industries to cement their influence in political arenas. However, concerns linger regarding the authenticity of progressive values among candidates backed by corporate money.
Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, voiced apprehension over the portrayal of corporate-backed candidates as genuine progressives, questioning whether the Democratic Party will elect representatives who truly support progressive policies or merely those who pay lip service to them.
As the political landscape evolves, both campaign finance experts and voters are grappling with the implications of technology industry influence. Brian Gaines, a political science professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, noted that public sentiment about technology firms is still forming, creating uncertainty around their political affiliations.
“People are wary of the technology,” Gaines remarked, highlighting the need for clearer distinctions between progressive and moderate candidates concerning AI and crypto policies.
___
Maya Sweedler contributed to this report.
___
Follow the AP’s coverage of the 2026 elections at https://apnews.com/hub/elections.
